task2ai

Best AI tools to check document plagiarism

Tool What it does Pricing Free tier Refunds
Scribbr A platform offering academic proofreading, plagiarism detection, citation generation, and various AI-based writing and editing tools. Free tier Yes —
Copyleaks An AI-powered content analysis platform for plagiarism detection, AI content detection, and content governance. Free tier; paid from $13.99/mo * Yes 10 days
Originality.ai AI detection, plagiarism checking, fact checking, readability, and grammar checking tools for content integrity. Free tier; paid from $12.95/mo * Yes —
GPTinf An all-in-one AI writing toolkit for detecting, humanizing, paraphrasing, and checking the grammar of text content. Free tier; paid from $4.99/mo * Yes —
Paperpal Integrated AI workspace for academic writing and submission preparation for researchers. Free tier * Yes —

— means the vendor does not state it on the pages we read.

* pricing not verified against the vendor's pricing page.

Screenshot of the Scribbr homepage

A platform offering academic proofreading, plagiarism detection, citation generation, and various AI-based writing and editing tools.

Detect and resolve unintentional plagiarism with the Scribbr Plagiarism Checker, so you can submit your paper with confidence.

— scribbr.com

Pricing, in their words: “We believe that every student should have the right tools for academic success. Free tools like a paraphrasing tool, AI Humanizer, grammar checker, summarizer and an AI Proofreader.” (pricing)

Subscription terms they state: cancel by email (source)

Limits the vendor states:

  • The Document must be education related.
  • Cannot cancel Plagiarism, Citation, Self-Plagiarism, or AI proofreader checks.

An AI-powered content analysis platform for plagiarism detection, AI content detection, and content governance.

Copyleaks scans AI-generated text and checks for potential plagiarism in a single report.

— copyleaks.com

Pricing: Free tier; paid from $13.99/mo (pricing)

Subscription terms they state: cancel in-app · auto-renews · 10-day refund window (source)

Limits the vendor states:

  • Cannot check for image plagiarism
Screenshot of the Originality.ai homepage

AI detection, plagiarism checking, fact checking, readability, and grammar checking tools for content integrity.

A modern, Al-powered plagiarism checker that is more accurate than Grammarly & Copyscape.

— originality.ai

Pricing: Free tier; paid from $12.95/mo (pricing)

Subscription terms they state: cancel in-app · auto-renews (source)

No usage limits stated on the pages we read.

An all-in-one AI writing toolkit for detecting, humanizing, paraphrasing, and checking the grammar of text content.

Check for plagiarism against all web sources available.

— gptinf.com

Pricing: Free tier; paid from $4.99/mo (pricing)

Subscription terms they state: cancel in-app (source)

No usage limits stated on the pages we read.

Screenshot of the Paperpal homepage

Integrated AI workspace for academic writing and submission preparation for researchers.

精准查重,通过可信赖的相似度检测,助你降低论文被初审拒稿的风险

— paperpal.com

Pricing: Free tier (pricing)

No usage limits stated on the pages we read.

FAQ

Is there a free tool to check document plagiarism?

Yes — Scribbr, Copyleaks, Originality.ai, GPTinf, Paperpal offer a free tier.

What is the cheapest paid option to check document plagiarism?

GPTinf starts at $4.99/month.

Which of these have an API?

Scribbr, Copyleaks, Originality.ai document a developer API.

How do I cancel these subscriptions?

Scribbr: cancel by email; Copyleaks: cancel in-app; Originality.ai: cancel in-app; GPTinf: cancel in-app. Paperpal does not state a cancellation route on the pages we read.

Can I get a refund?

Copyleaks states a 10-day refund window. The others (Scribbr, Originality.ai, GPTinf, Paperpal) do not state a refund policy on the pages we read.

Do these subscriptions auto-renew?

Copyleaks, Originality.ai state that paid plans renew automatically. Check the billing page before subscribing; the rest do not state it either way.

Sources

Every fact above was read from the vendors' own pages: